Business Society and Planet for Development- MyAssignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theBusiness Society and Planetfor Scenario Development. Answer: Scenario Development Company Overview The BHP Billiton is an Anglo-Australian mining company that has its headquarter in Melbourne. In terms of the revenue, it is the largest mining company of the world and fourth largest in all over Australia. With the help of the merger with Australian Broken Hill Proprietary Company Limited and also Dutch Billiton, the BHP Billiton was initiated in the year 2001. Hence, the company has resulted as one of the major organization in the mining sector. The company had its mining sector in all over Australia and also in the different parts of the globe. Ethical Issues Faced by the Company As the mining activity is generally involved with high level of natural degradation as it imposes lot of pressure within the environment. Moreover, as the mining activities are involved with high level risks for the workers, it is also the duty of the mining company to provide high level of security for all the mining workers. The BHP has to encounter the situation of natural disaster on 5th November 2005, which has resulted from the holding of Dam water from the region near the iron ore mining region of Mariana. The accident has resulted in the total devastation of the all the local houses causing the death of 17 people and 50 people have been suffered injury. This is also one of the major environmental disasters in Brazil, which was triggered due to the activity of human intervention (Black, 2016). The Bento Rodrigues dam disaster in the district of Mariana has resulted in the questioning of the ethical dilemmas about the business process and the mining activities related to BHP. During the construction of the Dam, there were issues raised about the matters related to public concerns. According to Cecala et al., (2014), it is essential before the project of Dam building and also to get proper approval from the local environmental authority, which will ensure that there are no major natural risks involved with the work of construction. However, in case of BHP, the company did not take any permission from the local environment department that could have resulted in the prevention of the construction work of the dam. The management of the company also ignored the facts related risks if flood that were involved in the overall process related to the construction work. It was also important to consider the fact that most of the risk assessment techniques that are used by the company managers were not effective as it did not used any information related to the risks that are associated within the environment. Hence, the risk assessment managers are the key stakeholders in the scenario of the business development process that ultimately leads to lowering of the risks that are usually associated with all types of mining activities. The management of the company also ignored and denied about the fact that they were aware about the report related to the environmental risks. The company also did not provide the compensation that is needed for the victim of the flood and also on the contrary, defended their own position without agreeing to the fact that the action of the natural disaster was triggered due to their mismanagement. The company also faced strict legal actions that were file against them by the local environment department. Moreover, due to official conflict within the organization, the company has to deal with the consequence of poor management. The risk assessment manager of the company did not take the charge of that helped them to deal with the consequences that lead to the occurrence of the natural disaster. The workers doing activity in the mining areas also have does not got the facility that could have allowed them to have high quality medical insurance service. As the news of the negligence by the management of the organization were leaked, the commonly also tried to unethically tried to neutralize the evidence in order to save their reputation within the society. Script Development Ethical Dilemma Conflict Due to the incident of plant in Brazil that is caused due to negligence of the BHP Company, several ethical issues have been raised against the organisation for not following the strict protocol of environmental regulation. It is the duty of every business organisation to ensure that no harm is caused to the local environment due to their business operational activities. They must also minimise that level of profit in order to ensure that no compromised is done on the quality of environment and also the health issues of the people. They also need to have a sustainable mode of development in order to have better business reputation within the society and established themselves as one of the most ethical companies. According to Lei et al., (2016), the Mining industry is generally involved with high level of criticism as decors use head to the environmental due to illegal trade practice and social exploitation. It is one of the most important ethical duties of all mining organisation and industry to ensure that minimum level of home is done to the environment which can be achieved by following the protocols of sustainable development. Getting the social licence is one of the most important parts of the act ivity related to mining activities that can help to deal with consequence of environmental degradation and also ensure that the people of the society well protected from any construction and mining activities. It is also important for the stakeholder of Mining industry to understand the importance of social corporate responsibility that will have them to prevent the damage within the environment and also respect the needs of all section of the people of the society. Robinson (2015), have mentioned about the ideas related to social licence that helps in operational process of multiple industry and help them to established themselves as a responsible Social Organisation. The main Social Responsibility in case of a Mining industry is to provide compensation for all the natural resources extraction that is done in order to gain social acceptance and insured that no illegal process is being practiced within the business. In case of BHP industry not getting proper social licence has been one of the main key ethical dilemmas. The construction of dam was done without taking proper consent from the local authority and also ignoring about the needs of the local people and the risk involved with the construction work. They also ignore the importance of getting a social licence in order to establish themselves as a corporate social responsible group. In most of the cases, it has been seen that the mining industry ignore about the matters related to the environmental protection and also safeguarding the needs of local people in order to maximize their profit. The same case has happened with BHP as they failed to provide high level of construction work that do not compromise on the environment and also cause risk to the potential environmental disasters. Role of Stakeholders The sustainable livelihood of development is one of the main focus area for all Mining industry and construction work. Multiple levels of stakeholders are involved in the process of ethical dilemmas of mining and construction industry. It is important in the context to have dialogue at multiple level of stakeholder in order to find a come on solution for every that is involved in this process. The mechanism of global ethics in Mining industry is an important part of the dialogue between stakeholders that can help in mining operations by safeguarding the interest of every group. The people of the society plays an important part in order to provide corporate social duties that can help the Mining industry to follow the path of questionable development and also ensure that minimum level of risk is involved in every operational activity. According to Gutierrez (2015), capacity building is a privilege part and key element of corporate social responsibility that can help to benefit the int erest of every group of stakeholders involved in this process. Jarrett (2017), have added in the context that capacity building can theoretically help to develop corporate sustainable responsibilities. It can also help in the process of getting of proper authorised social operating licence in order to deal with activities that can cause serious threat to the local environment. The collaboration of stakeholders including company authorities and members from local social environmental groups and also represented from the local government before implementing any mining activity project can overall help to enhance the ethical duties and also ensure that all mining activities are operated under protected environmental act. Partnership between local communities and large scale corporate organisation can help in the development of skills that is needed in the process of Mining industry and also capacity building operations. Nevertheless the capacity building process cannot be regarded as t he best solutions to deal with every situations leading to community operation process. High level of understanding is an important part of developing capacity building process between two groups of social organisation and corporate. The issues related to environmental degradation and social responsibility can help in the process of development of ethical dilemmas of Mining industry. It is not the only duty of Mining industry to look after the needs of local environment but also ensure that all construction and mining workers get proper safety protocols that can help them to deal with all challenges and risky activities. Ignoring about the facts related to environmental protection can cause serious damage to the social reputation of an organisation and also there are risks of violating legal protocols that can also cease the operational activities of an organisation. The most important part of the ethical dilemmas in case of the mining industry is that in most of the cases, the aspects related to the environmental protection are totally ignored in most of the cases. According to Siegel (2013), it is one of the most challenging part of all mining industry to have a perfect balance between sustainable development and economic growth of business. In other words it can be said that protection of both environmental and economic factors is one of the most challenging part of all mining operational activities. Due to lack of information in most of the cases and also poor level of awareness is mainly responsible for ignoring the facts related to environmental protection and also not looking after the needs of local people. The mining activities is an important part of all developed Nations and with the advancement of Technology and automobiles the requirement of natural resources has been going up significantly in the past few years. Hence, there has been a huge pressure and challenge for the mining corporates to provide higher rate of production to meet the Global energy demand. There are several instances that can be regarded as cases for environmental aspects of have been ignored due to the fact that the pressure of keeping the production rate high has always been a challenge. Nevertheless, it is the duty of all mining corporates and organisation to provide full support to the needs of local environment and also the needs of the people and other group of stakeholders involved in the entire operational process. Safeguarding the needs of the local people can also help mining Industries like BHP who established themselves as a corporate social responsibility and thereby increase the reputation within the society. It is also possible to minimise the risk and cause that can trigger natural calamity like flood and other accidents. Reference Black, L. D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility as capability: the case of BHP Billiton. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, (23), 25. Cecala, A. B., Organiscak, J. A., Noll, J. D., Rider, J. P. (2014). Key components for an effective filtration and pressurization system for mobile mining equipment. Mining Engineering, 66(1). Gutierrez, M. (2015, February). Digging deep for mining education ethics: Canadian higher education in the global arena of resource extraction. Graduate Student SYMPOSIUM, Selected Papers, Vol. 9. Jarrett, D. A. (2017). Coal Seam Gas Mining and Stakeholder Management. Newcastle Business School Student Journal, 1(1), 41-50. Lei, S., Hanxiao, K., Jian, W., Xu, H., Ke, H. (2016). The Status and Achievements of Green Mines and Mining Ethics in China. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 7(5), 317-322. Robinson, S. C. (2015). The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Applying Rawlsian Ethics in Data Mining Marketing. Journal of Media Ethics, 30(1), 19-30. Siegel, S. (2013). The missing ethics of mining. Ethics International Affairs, 27(01), 3-17.